翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Victor ・ R v Viljoen ・ R v W (D) ・ R v Walker ・ R v Wallace ・ R v Wang ・ R v Wanhalla ・ R v Waterfield ・ R v Wells ・ R v Whitfield ・ R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc ・ R v Latimer (1997) ・ R v Lavallee ・ R v Lawrence ・ R v Leary ・ R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ・ R v Lifchus ・ R v Lipman ・ R v Loubser ・ R v Lovelass ・ R v Lucas ・ R v M (MR) ・ R v Mabula ・ R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine ・ R v Mann ・ R v Manninen ・ R v Mapara ・ R v Marquard ・ R v Marshall ・ R v Marshall; R v Bernard Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ''R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell'' (1920) 28 CLR 23 is a High Court of Australia case about inconsistency between Commonwealth and State legislation, which is dealt with by s 109 of the Australian Constitution. It is the leading example of what is known as the impossibility of simultaneous obedience test. == Background == Section 166 of the ''Liquor Act'' 1912 (Qld) stated that a State referendum on liquor trading hours was to be held on the same day as the Senate elections. However, section 14 of the ''Commonwealth Electoral (Wartime) Act'' 1917 (Cth) forbid electors from voting at a State referendum or vote on the same day as the Senate elections, which were held on 5 May 1917. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.